On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 04:28:18PM -0400, Vladimir Vuksan wrote: > > Any thoughts on why we shouldn't make the Github our primary repository ?
as it was explained long time ago when I proposed the same and were rejected we will also need to change our scripts so that they will be able to work without subversion, to make a package. * the svn release is used as the MICRO release number * the changelog is created dynamically from svn log * the development tracks svn changelog numbers to keep track of merges from trunk, since svn is limited to do so automatically (until recently), but this last one is something that git would to automatically and will only reflect maybe in the way we do integrations and how they get "approved" using git allows for a much more dynamic development, specially since there are already significant codebases that are being maintained in parallel and using svn, limits how easily they could be integrated back. in that same line, it would be a good idea, most likely, to allow for some time for that people which had already diverged trees using svn to either got those changes integrated in there, or move them to their own trees using git, and so during that period, keeping both trees on sync somehow would be needed. Carlo ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2 _______________________________________________ Ganglia-developers mailing list Ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ganglia-developers
