> From: Bernard Li <bern...@vanhpc.org>

>To: Daniel Pocock <dan...@pocock.com.au> 
>Cc: "ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net" 
><ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net>; Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon 
><care...@sajinet.com.pe> 
>Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2012 10:24 PM
>Subject: Re: [Ganglia-developers] 3.3.5 tagged
> 
>
>I thought the original idea was that the "web" component was going to be a 
>separate entity and thus can be released at different cycles from the other 
>components.  If we are again releasing web at the same time as ganglia-core 
>then this is back to how things were originally when the code is in SVN.
>
>Just my $0.02.
>
>Cheers,
>
>Bernard
>

 Add my coins  to that. Wanted to write the same. Just lets be progressive and 
split out the WEB part from the data collection part and let them move at their 
own pace. That cross project link in the repo  is most confusing anyway.

Cheers

Martin


>On Tuesday, March 27, 2012, Daniel Pocock <dan...@pocock.com.au> wrote:
>> On 27/03/2012 16:52, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 04:50:18PM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Release 3.3.5
>>>>
>>>> The release has now been tagged in git
>>>> commit = 9db9beea062c7ce5e5b4d10ed553c9b7cea7642e
>>>
>>> wrong bundle :
>>>
>>>    carenas@dell ~/src/git/ganglia $ git describe --tags
>>>    3.3.5
>>>    carenas@dell ~/src/git/ganglia $ cd web/
>>>    carenas@dell ~/src/git/ganglia/web $ git describe --tags
>>>    3.3.2-3
>>>
>>> while web has since had a lot more fixes added as shown by :
>>>
>>>    carenas@dell ~/src/git/ganglia-web $ git describe --tags
>>>    3.3.4-14-g7383ed8
>>>    carenas@dell ~/src/git/ganglia-web $ git diff --stat 3.3.2-3.. | cat
>>>    Makefile                         |    2 +-
>>>    api/host.php                     |    9 ++++++---
>>>    cluster_view.php                 |    4 ++--
>>>    functions.php                    |   15 +++++++++++----
>>>    graph.php                        |    5 +++--
>>>    header.php                       |    1 +
>>>    inspect_graph.php                |    4 ++--
>>>    templates/default/views_view.tpl |   16 ++++++++++++++++
>>>    8 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>
>> Does this result in any actual breakage: does 3.3.5 break anything that
>> was working in 3.3.1 or 3.3.0?  If the answer to that question is `no',
>> then we ignore this issue and 3.3.5 continues to be the release candidate.
>>
>> Are these all fixes that belong in the 3.3.x release, or are some of
>> them features that belong in 3.4.x?
>>
>> I am not automatically increasing the pointer to the web submodule
>> because I think that only crucial things should be accepted in 3.3.x
>> releases from now on - the alternative is that
>> a) we freeze the web repo against all non-essential commits until the
>> release is finally finished
>> b) I update the pointer to the web repo on every 3.3.x release attempt
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> This SF email is sponsosred by:
>> Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ganglia-developers mailing list
>> Ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ganglia-developers
>> 
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>This SF email is sponsosred by:
>Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here 
>http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure
>_______________________________________________
>Ganglia-developers mailing list
>Ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ganglia-developers
>
>
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF email is sponsosred by:
Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure
_______________________________________________
Ganglia-developers mailing list
Ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ganglia-developers

Reply via email to