>>> Is it possible for you to build a CentOS 5.5 x86_64 VM and see if you
could compile from the 3.1.7 tarball?
In extremis yes, but I'd much prefer to stay with our Redhat builds if
possible.
>>>Anything special about that host in particular? Have you tried
building on another Red Hat ES 5.5 server?
Nothing particularly strange, this is a new build, and only the only
application running is Ganglia.
I have just compiled successfully on another very similar server (although
this is running Nagios too). Both are Dell PowerEdge R610's with 24GB RAM.
Both gcc version 4.1.2 20080704 (Red Hat 4.1.2-48), and both have these
packages...
apr-1.2.7-11.el5_5.2
apr-devel-1.2.7-11.el5_5.2
apr-util-1.2.7-11.el5_5.1
expat-1.95.8-8.3.el5_5.3
expat-devel-1.95.8-8.3.el5_5.3
libconfuse-2.5-4.el5
libconfuse-devel-2.5-4.el5
pcre-6.6-2.el5_1.7
pcre-devel-6.6-2.el5_1.7
perl-rrdtool-1.2.23-1.el4.rf
rrdtool-1.2.23-1.el4.rf
rrdtool-devel-1.2.23-1.el4.rf
My failing server faults on
gcc -I../lib -I../gmond -I../include -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE
-DSYSCONFDIR=\"/etc/ganglia\" -g -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall
-D_REENTRANT -o .libs/gmetad gmetad.o cmdline.o data_thread.o server.o
process_xml.o rrd_helpers.o conf.o type_hash.o xml_hash.o cleanup.o
../lib/.libs/libganglia.so -lrrd -lm -lnsl -lpcre /usr/lib64/libexpat.so
-lconfuse /usr/lib64/libapr-1.so -ldl -lpthread
but this same command executes successfully on the other server.
config.status and config.log are identical on both servers.
Obviously there is a difference between the two environments, but I've
yet to find anything. Any pointers on what to check much appreciated.
Cheers, Nigel
Internet
[email protected]
12/10/2010 00:53
To
Nigel LEACH
cc
[email protected]
Subject
Re: [Ganglia-general] Compilation Problems
Hi Nigel:
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 7:21 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:
btw 3.1.2 does compile and make successfully (although it did require an
autoreconf)
3.1.2 was bootstrapped with autoconf 2.59 and 3.1.7 was bootstrapped with
autoconf 2.61. Perhaps that's why you are seeing the difference.
However, I tried to reproduce your system as much as possible with CentOS
5.5 but was not able to reproduce the error. Is it possible for you to
build a CentOS 5.5 x86_64 VM and see if you could compile from the 3.1.7
tarball?
Anything special about that host in particular? Have you tried building
on another Red Hat ES 5.5 server?
Cheers,
Bernard
___________________________________________________________
This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are
not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please
notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. Any unauthorised copying,
disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is prohibited.
Please refer to
http://www.bnpparibas.co.uk/en/information/legal_information.asp?Code=ECAS-845C5H
for additional disclosures.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports
standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3.
Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great
experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/beautyoftheweb
_______________________________________________
Ganglia-general mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ganglia-general
