sorry, forgot the list ...

 ------------------------------------------------------
Martin Knoblauch
email: k n o b i AT knobisoft DOT de
www:   http://www.knobisoft.de



----- Forwarded Message ----
> From: Martin Knoblauch <[email protected]>
> To: Whit Blauvelt <[email protected]>
> Sent: Fri, November 12, 2010 5:35:44 PM
> Subject: Re: [Ganglia-general] How can gmetad be configured for 2 clusters?
> 
> Hi Whit,
> 
>  let me guess, all of your machines are running multicast, and  all are on 
> the 

> same port? As a result, every "gmond" will have the complete  information for 
>all 
>
> 8 nodes. That is what you see. Try "telnet 192.168.19  8649" and you will see 
>the 
>
> info of all eight nodes.
> 
>  In order to  separate the two clusters, they need to run on different ports.
> 
>  In  addition: when you list more than one node on the data_source, this does 
>not 
>
> define the cluster. I just adds failover capability. "gmetad" will only talk  
>to 
>
> one of the hosts at a time. If that fails, it will try the next on the  list.
> 
> Hope this helps a bit
> 
> Martin 
> ------------------------------------------------------
> Martin  Knoblauch
> email: k n o b i AT knobisoft DOT de
> www:  http://www.knobisoft.de
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----
> >  From: Whit Blauvelt <[email protected]>
> > To: [email protected]
> >  Sent: Fri, November 12, 2010 4:53:49 PM
> > Subject: [Ganglia-general] How  can gmetad be configured for 2 clusters?
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> >  Although I've looked through the docs, I must not be looking in the   right
> > place. We've added a second cluster, and want to track it as  a  separate
> > entity from the first. What intuitively seems likely to  work  doesn't
> > accomplish that. I've tried:
> > 
> > -  Defining two clusters like this  in gmetad.conf:
> > 
> >  data_source "Cluster1" localhost 192.168.19 192.168.1.32   192.168.1.16
> > data_source "Cluster2" 192.168.1.24 192.168.1.8  192.168.1.5  192.168.1.6
> > 
> > - And defining the cluster name  in each  gmond.conf:
> > 
> > cluster {
> >   name =  "Cluster1"
> >   owner =  "unspecified"
> >   latlong =  "unspecified"
> >   url =  "unspecified"
> > }
> > 
> > The result? The Web front end gives a choice of Grid  >  Cluster1 or 
>Cluster2,
> > but either choice shows all 8 machines in  both  clusters. (The only
> > difference is that under Cluster1 the  Linux members all  have their names
> > shown in the listing, while  under Cluster2 the Linux members  are shown 
just
> > by IPs - while the  OSX show their names in both cases - but  this isn't the
> > show  stopper here.)
> > 
> > No doubt the right solution is as  simple  and obvious as the wrong one I've
> > tried. But what is it? All  examples  I've found assume a single  cluster.
> > 
> >  Thanks,
> > Whit
> > 
> >  
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >  Centralized  Desktop Delivery: Dell and VMware Reference  Architecture
> > Simplifying  enterprise desktop deployment and  management using
> > Dell EqualLogic storage  and VMware View: A highly  scalable, end-to-end
> > client virtualization  framework. Read  more!
> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/dell-eql-dev2dev
> >  _______________________________________________
> > Ganglia-general   mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ganglia-general
> > 另
> 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Centralized Desktop Delivery: Dell and VMware Reference Architecture
Simplifying enterprise desktop deployment and management using
Dell EqualLogic storage and VMware View: A highly scalable, end-to-end
client virtualization framework. Read more!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/dell-eql-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Ganglia-general mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ganglia-general

Reply via email to