The ALU Wiki has a feature whereby every page has a cousin page to be used for discussing the first page. (Well, not every page--the page discussion pages can not be discussed.)
I suggest that we *not* use that feature for project discussion--i.e. if you're talking about stuff a project should or should not do or adding information that would be useful to folks working on the project, do that on the project page proper. The use, if any, as I see it, for the page discussion pages is literally for discussing the page--meta commentary such as, "This page is getting too long, let's split it into two pages", or "Does anyone mind if I change all the instances of LISP to Lisp on this page?" In other words, stuff that has no direct impact on the project itself. Admittedly I'm just making this up but it seems better to me to have the project page be the one-stop-shop for information about the project itself which can include appropriately digested discussion. Or maybe I'm on crack. -Peter -- Peter Seibel * [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gigamonkeys Consulting * http://www.gigamonkeys.com/ Practical Common Lisp * http://www.gigamonkeys.com/book/ _______________________________________________ Gardeners mailing list [email protected] http://www.lispniks.com/mailman/listinfo/gardeners
