On Dec 28, 2005, at 7:54 AM, Paolo Amoroso wrote: > Eric Hanchrow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> I wonder if it might be ... interesting ... to try tagging packages, >> rather than categorizing them. Since tagging is all the rage on the > > Indeed. The exercise of putting together a category hierarchy, the > feedback I have received, and just a couple of decades of research on > object-oriented design, have convinced me of its inflexibility. An > extensible set of tags is a better approach. > > I will discuss with Marc whether LinkIt can be modified to support > tags, and report back here. Stay tuned. >
If Marc could implement this in such a way that anyone can add a tag to any library and let people vote on the tags as they do links now... Cheers, Bob > > Paolo > -- > Lisp Propulsion Laboratory log - http://www.paoloamoroso.it/log > _______________________________________________ > Gardeners mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.lispniks.com/mailman/listinfo/gardeners ---- Bob Hutchison -- blogs at <http://www.recursive.ca/hutch/> Recursive Design Inc. -- <http://www.recursive.ca/> Raconteur -- <http://www.raconteur.info/> _______________________________________________ Gardeners mailing list [email protected] http://www.lispniks.com/mailman/listinfo/gardeners
