Ok, thank you for your answer. JC On 2006/01/06, at 4:34, Paolo Amoroso wrote:
> JC Helary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Does that mean that Lisp applications are easier to document using >> TexInfo ? Are there specific TexInfo tools that can extract >> documentation from the lisp code to create the application >> documentation for example ? Would you suggest TexInfo to be the >> default documentation format for List applications ? > > I see. No, Texinfo is just a formatting language, it is not designed > for extracting documentation from Lisp source code--or other sources, > for that matter. I actually meant that the Texinfo formatting > language provides a rich set of commands for describing many kinds of > entities found in Lisp code such as DEFUNs, DEFMACROs, DEFVARs, etc. > > This information is usually inserted manually while editing a > document. The SBCL developers, however, have tools for extracting > information from source code and generating Texinfo-formatted files > that are part of the user manual. See create-contrib-doc-list.lisp > and docstrings.lisp in the doc/manual directory of the SBCL source > tree. > > > Paolo > -- > Lisp Propulsion Laboratory log - http://www.paoloamoroso.it/log > _______________________________________________ > Gardeners mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.lispniks.com/mailman/listinfo/gardeners > _______________________________________________ Gardeners mailing list [email protected] http://www.lispniks.com/mailman/listinfo/gardeners
