That's pretty much just what I wanted to hear. It seams like an awful lot of work for him to take on with all the other duties he has, and I wasn't sure if he would be able to put in the time. I feel better though knowing that he will be checking the entries for validity as much as possible.
+1 Christopher On 1/12/06, Paolo Amoroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Christopher Roach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > The only concern I have is to the quality of the answers. In the > > description of the how we can contribute to the the FAQ, you mention > > that we can send either questions or questions and answers to your > > email address. Since this group is made up of mostly newbies (myself > > included) how do we make sure that the answers submitted are as > > correct as possible (especially since Lisp doesn't just have to deal > > This should be taken care of by Peter's editorial control. > > > Paolo > -- > Lisp Propulsion Laboratory log - http://www.paoloamoroso.it/log > _______________________________________________ > Gardeners mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.lispniks.com/mailman/listinfo/gardeners > -- Christopher Roach [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Gardeners mailing list [email protected] http://www.lispniks.com/mailman/listinfo/gardeners
