Matthew Astley wrote: > Here's a spec idea: could one declare a thread to be an outcast, > banned from touching any specials or shared lexicals that don't meet > some standard locking mechanism? This probably means no access to > vast tracts of CL that read or modify global stuff, but it would > partition the problem of what might need to be locked.
I don't think so. This would be too intrusive. Cheers, Marco _______________________________________________ Gardeners mailing list [email protected] http://www.lispniks.com/mailman/listinfo/gardeners
