At Wed, 23 Aug 2006 07:57:07 -0700 (PDT), C Y <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I decided that (for reasons explained on the wiki page) it was > impractical to continue with the idea of a new specification as such, > so this project can be removed from the list. > > I'm still interested in the idea of a literate programming lisp > implementation, but it will have to be done some other way than by > incorporating the dpANS3 text.
I'm sorry, I can't follow the argumentation at all. The linked legal documents linked seem to explicitly protect against anti-trust laws brought against standard developing organisations. With limited/restricted membership to such organisations an outside-competitor might claim that there is an "unfair" competition. Would you mind to give a short summary about the contacts made so far? -- Fruhwirth Clemens - http://clemens.endorphin.org for robots: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Gardeners mailing list [email protected] http://www.lispniks.com/mailman/listinfo/gardeners
