I'm looking forward to a new Lispbox release. I have a pretty well customized configuration as of now but it was built on the foundation of Peter's Lispbox.
I'm interested particularly as to whether it would be practical for you, Peter, to include a Mac layer to the bundled Emacs. Even so far as to use Emacs.app or Aquamacs. I understand that it is preferrable that Lispbox be as vanilla as possible. I do not know, however, that for the Mac Lispbox releases using one of the aforementioned Emacs distributions or another would significantly impact the universality of your excellent Lispbox downloads. Thank you, in any case, for the knowledge and the wonderful Lispbox downloads. Don On 3/10/07, Peter Seibel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Keith Irwin wrote: > > Folks-- > > > > Is this list still in existence? > > It is. It's been quiet but I've recently been getting me head out from > underwater (new parent) and working on some Lisp stuff again such as > updating the Lispbox distros and working on the FAQ. > > > Anyway, I created a library located at: > > > > http://code.google.com/p/cl-strings/ > > > > which is an imitation of Java's String and StringTokenizer classes. > > Does anyone need such an imitation? Is the Java String functions > > particular great as these things go? > > > > Probably not. > > > > But the main purpose for me was to force myself to do the sort of > > things one does for creating a library, such as setting up the > > project on the web (in this case google code), documenting the code, > > writing tests, writing a nice Weitzian documentation page and so on > > and so forth. > > > > (Alas, not all the tests are complete, but the functions are so > > simple.... ) > > > > The great thing about picking the string library from Java is that I > > had a spec and I didn't have a specific app I needed these functions > > for. Normally, if I'm in the middle of writing an application, I > > just write the functions I need and don't attempt to generalize > > because, well, I need to get the application done. > > > > I hope others will pick some simple library from another language and > > write a cl-lib for it. Maybe if we all picked one and then put them > > all together, we'd get that "standard-lisp-library" we all want, > > though I guess the projects at common-lisp.net are adding up to that > > anyway. > > Cool. One thing I'm planning to do as I resume working on Lispbox is > including various libraries in it that I think are useful. So if you do > work like this be sure to let me know and I'll take a look and see if I > think it should be included in the Lispbox toolkit. > > Also folks should feel free to nominate other libraries that they find > useful. > > > PS. The google code repo stuff is pretty nice. Very clean, nice set > > of default features, mostly good enough for most thing. > > One warning--it turns out that you have to have a "Gmail" account to be > a project owner or member. A non-Gmail Google account is somehow > different and not sufficient. > > -Peter > > -- > Peter Seibel : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gigamonkeys Consulting : http://www.gigamonkeys.com/ > _______________________________________________ > Gardeners mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.lispniks.com/mailman/listinfo/gardeners > Donald C. Lindsay [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://forwardarc.com _______________________________________________ Gardeners mailing list [email protected] http://www.lispniks.com/mailman/listinfo/gardeners
