On 2009-03-19 7:18 AM, Alessio Stalla wrote:

> Since you want to store a fixed number of fields for every object,
> structures or classes are better suited for your task:

Would this be more efficient than just storing hashes in his outer hash? It's 
how I'd do it in Perl, where hashes are a very natural medium. I've come to 
think of hashes in Common Lisp as serving an identical purpose.

-- 
Mason Loring Bliss             [email protected]            Ewige Blumenkraft!
(if awake 'sleep (aref #(sleep dream) (random 2))) -- Hamlet, Act III, Scene I
_______________________________________________
Gardeners mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.lispniks.com/mailman/listinfo/gardeners

Reply via email to