On Fri, 6 Nov 2009, Daniel Pezely wrote: > If choice of alternate wiki is still an open conversation, consider > Confluence. Although it's a commercial app, free licenses are > available: > http://www.atlassian.com/software/confluence/licensing.jsp#nonprofit > (It runs on the JVM and can use PostgreSQL for its back-end.)
I might consider it if we had a volunteer who would host it long-term. Personally, I prefer MediaWiki simply because its what I know (through Wikipedia) and can set up (no experience with Java web hosting). Confluence may be good; but I simply want a wiki to generate content, not as a showcase for underlying technology. I've heard Rich Hickey say something to the effect of "wikis are a commodity technology -- users don't care what they run on", and I agree with the sentiment. Now if somebody used lisp to implement some cool (dynamic?) content on top of a wiki... http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/API Later, Daniel _______________________________________________ Gardeners mailing list [email protected] http://www.lispniks.com/mailman/listinfo/gardeners
