Thanks Guenther...Paul fixed all of these issues in patch-53. :-) Bob
On Sat, 2005-02-12 at 03:39 +0100, guenther wrote: > On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 22:02 +1100, Paul Drain wrote: > > GARNOME 2.10 Beta 2 > > =================== > > (the 'the beagle's back' release.) > > First quick updates to GARNOME 2.10 Beta 2 > ========================================== > (the 'he who breaks my build, goes back to the house of pain' [1] release) > > Blah, yet another tarball that is broken out of the box. Paul, if you > want guinea pigs before a tarball release, there are at least 2 of 'em > hanging out on IRC most of the time. "You know, who you are." Don't we, > Bob? ;-) > > The issues with GARNOME 2.9.91 aka 2.10 Beta 2, which is patch-52 in > arch land. Confused, anyone? ;) > > * desktop/bug-buddy depends on desktop/gnome-menus. A fact the LIBDEPS > don't reflect, thus breaking the unattended build. > > * desktop/nautilus: As Jeremiah and Joseph already discussed, the > gar-base.diff file seems to be old. 2 of 3 patches fail to get > applied. > > * bindings/gtkmm has the wrong md5sum. According to > http://ftp.acc.umu.se/pub/GNOME/sources/gtkmm/2.5/gtkmm-2.5.5.md5sum > it is '80babe692a8b59e62e68af28ea2f3ed1'. > > What's up with the build monkeys? Anyway, that's it for now... > > ...guenther > > > [1] Initially, I pondered naming this update 'ain't life a bitch' [2], > but I decided to drop the movie quote in favor of some slightly adjusted > song lyrics... (Does anyone recall either of 'em? ;) > > [2] Which is how I feel, right now -- but that ain't nothing to do with > Garnome. > > > -- > char *t="[EMAIL PROTECTED]"; > main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1: > (c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}} > -- Bob Kashani http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~bobk/garnome -- garnome-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/garnome-list
