On Tue, 2005-06-14 at 21:17 +0200, guenther wrote: > On Sun, 2005-06-12 at 21:51 -0400, Joseph E. Sacco, Ph.D. wrote: > > Rant on: > > > > It would be a really "good thing" if a weekly build were known to be > > build-able on some [any???] platform before it is released to the > > unknowing. Throwing out something that may build just because you are > > feeling "lucky" is not a very good idea
I was actually going to rant-reply to this, but guenther answered it all for me, so i'll be quiet now :) Suffice to say, the autobuilder (the script-goodness that powers the generation of the weekly tarballs) was only configured to build desktop/ and platform/ successfully before cleaning up, forking, making a tarball and sending me an e-mail that says 'upload this...' In the next week or two (whenever I get time), i'll clean this up so it builds *everything* before it does things -- which would make this a lot more foolproof. > You likely are the most helpful user building and testing a lot of > releases and giving valuable feedback. > > Now what if every supposedly unstable snapshot would build perfectly out > of the box... ;-) I'd have a lot less work to do :) > Evolution 2.3.3 is known to have some build issues. A new minor release > 2.3.3.1 is expected to be released tomorrow. Has this actually appeared yet? Regards, Paul -- garnome-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/garnome-list
