> > There are some yet to be resolved licensing issues with openh323/pwlib
> > that Paul was looking into.
>
> pwlib/work/main.d/pwlib-1.8.7/ReadMe.txt under license:
>
> openh323 has the same license.
>
> ---snip---
>
> 9. Licensing
> ------------
>
> The bulk of this library is licensed under the MPL (Mozilla Public
> License) version 1.0.
[...]
> ---snip---
>
> It seems ok to me. Both Fedora (Red Hat) and Ubuntu (Debian) ship
> pwlib/openh323 so it seems absurd to me that we wouldn't include a
> garball for them. Especially when you consider that we don't ship any
> software, just a link to the software. Paul...?
MPL, eh? Like bootstrap/firefox. What's the issue?
Anyway, yes -- we are neither shipping binaries nor the actual source
code. Distributing a link to any sources that are freely available
should not be an issue. It's the software that uses the libs that has to
care about that stuff.
...guenther
--
char *t="[EMAIL PROTECTED]";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
--
garnome-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/garnome-list
