"R. Lahaye" wrote:
> Before I do that, a simple question:
>
> Is something as simple as underlining such a complicated issue in LyX/LaTeX ?
> Shouldn't be!
>
> And if this is so, why not let LyX do the proper work when underbar is used?
>
> Rob.
Don't know. I did not even know that underbar existed in layout
character. I think ulem underlines with \em, but be warned that it only
shows up in ps or dvi view, not lyx view. The details are at the end
ulem.sty in latex/misc
Maybe a guru will answer.
Garst
