Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> 
> >>>>> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> Andre> On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 03:11:25PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> Andre> wrote: Shouldn't the T1 encoding stuff be a document property
> Andre> instead of a "global LyX option"?
> >>  This is a question that comes up regularly. The idea was that the
> >> presence of T1 fonts is more a property of the site than the
> >> document. Some people do not have proer t1 fonts installed.

Surely John could fix configure to test for proper t1 fonts.
(ducking) 
> Andre> Well, Konni was complaining that she's got to switch it on and
> Andre> off all day if she's working on different documents at the same
> Andre> time. Don't ask me why, but as there seems to be reasons to
> Andre> have in on in one doc and off in another it sounds sensible to
> Andre> me to have that as a document property...
> 
> So I have to ask ``why?''. Understanding Konni's reasons would
> certainly help the discussion.
> 
Whereas Konni's reasons would be interesting and perhaps enlightening,
the fact remains that an experienced tester sees an inconvenience. The
"global LyX option" could be just a way of saying "I have T1 fonts,"
then the document property would be activated to say "use T1 encoding."
Garst

Reply via email to