Lars Gullik Bj�nnes wrote: > > Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > >> | - return pdm.logicalDpiY(); > >> | + return 0.5 * (pdm.logicalDpiX() + pdm.logicalDpiY()); > >> > >> I would have prefred some (pdm.logicalDpiX() + > >> pdm.logicalDpiY()) / 2.0 > >> > >> to me it seems more strait forward... > > > | Well, never mind dear. Perhaps you should lie down for a while. > > > | Anyway, I was taught in the Fortran, number crunching world that > | divide is a more expensive operation than multiply and it should > | be avoided if possible. Why isn't this fixed point anyway? Are fractional dpi's useful? Garst
