"A.P.Manners" wrote: > Unless someone knows otherwise (knows how to instruct boost to get > around the missing header files in std) I would conclude that boost is > preventing lyx from being built with gcc 2.95.2. I could be wrong, but I think what you need is a good libstdc++ . It comes with gcc3 something, but there are other ways to get it if you have that option. Somebody correct me if I'm way off.
Garst
