Mark, Ken, John, and all the others that have followed this conversation.
I whole heartedly agree. with Ken and many others, there are terms that fit ALL the known gases (and even terms for gases we haven't' found yet). These terms (or gas definitions) have been in place many 10's If not 100's of years; and, with that said, I preclude that ANYONE that uses the incorrect definition of these gases, is one of three simple things: A) In ignorance as to the exact gas composition they are speaking about, and errantly using the term or label incorrectly. B) In ignorance as to the exact gas composition they are speaking about, and simply put, either dumb or stupid. C) Someone knowingly trying to mislead others, hence a liar. Most fall into "A" but as we see, there are some that Fit "B" or worse, "C". Happy New Year Everyone. Greg Manning, Canadian Gasifier Ltd. (http://www.cangas.ca) Building Hi-Performance Gasifiers, Since 2001 Brandon, Manitoba, Canada 1 (204) 726-1851 -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]on Behalf Of Ken Calvert Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2010 5:41 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Gasification] Syn Gas John, Well Done! I am with you 100% on using specific terminology. All that we ever made was Woodgas! Some of it was good. A lot of it was bad! Ken C. ----- Original Message ----- From: <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, December 31, 2010 10:54 AM Subject: [Gasification] Syn Gas > Like many of you, I have been in the chemical industry for many years. > It has been my experience that a gas became synthesis gas or syn-gas <<Snip>> _______________________________________________ Gasification mailing list to Send a Message to the list, use the email address [email protected] to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/gasification_lists.bioenergylists.org for more Gasifiers, News and Information see our web site: http://gasifiers.bioenergylists.org/
