Tom
 
Range fuel gasification technology was an externally heated pressuries pipe 
with a transport screew inside when I saw it.
 
It was very similar to the pyrolysis unit on the wiking gasifier but they had 
ideas to upscale it to 4 tons pr hour by stacking pipes with screew conveyers. 
 
Thinking of the challenges of making the 1 tons pr hour screew pyrolyser in 
Haslev i have doubts this principle will ever be competitive for energy 
production - even for atmospherich applications.
 
Thomas Koch 
 
 
 

________________________________

Fra: [email protected] på vegne af Tom Miles
Sendt: ti 25-01-2011 00:25
Til: 'Discussion of biomass pyrolysis and gasification'
Emne: Re: [Gasification] Range Fuels Closing Plant



Jim,

 

Just making light of public funding. 

 

The appropriate use of public funding is to offset risk on new technologies. 
The funds are not free. Private companies often prefer to forgo public funding 
simply because of the time and costs involved in obtaining the funding and 
managing the project. I think US Department of Energy has not been pleased with 
the results from their funding of the "Integrated Biorefinery" pilot projects 
in general but it is a multimillion dollar effort and there will be failures.

 

Range Fuels published very little about their process, even to funding 
agencies. Early on I understood that it involved slow pyrolysis as a first 
step. As such it presumably should have been a good process for making 
synthesis gas and biochar. Perhaps like some other processes another company 
will pick up the pieces and eventually make renewable fuels. 

 

Tom     

 

 

 

 

 

From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jim Leach
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2011 2:41 PM
To: 'Discussion of biomass pyrolysis and gasification'
Subject: Re: [Gasification] Range Fuels Closing Plant

 

Tom, not sure of the point you are making, but my point is that if one country 
choses to eliminate funding for research and development and all of the other 
countries that it competes against does not,  the county that chose not to fund 
it will soon be forced to buy all of its hight technology equipment and 
services from the other countries.  Over time, its currency will decline and 
its standard of living will decline.  It is much wiser to keep funding research 
and development and just try to get better at how you do it.    

 

JAMES T. LEACH, P.E.

President

 

DANA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

32242 Paseo Adelanto, Suite D

San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675

Ph 949-496-6516

Fx 949-496-8133

Mobile 949-933-6518

 

_______________________________________________
Gasification mailing list

to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
[email protected]

to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/gasification_lists.bioenergylists.org

for more Gasifiers,  News and Information see our web site:
http://gasifiers.bioenergylists.org/

Reply via email to