Dear Toby and all Toby's last statement
> Does the first step make producer gas or syngas? Apparently the technical > review didn't know the difference or was asked to overlook it and it makes > about a 10x difference. Was my firm belief until two years ago. Now many people are making both FT diesel and methanol from 50% N2 producer gas. I believe the excess N2 buffers the reaction and protects the catalyst. COMMENTS? Tom Reed, AKA Dr Thomas B Reed President, The Biomass Energy Foundation www.Woodgas.com On Jan 29, 2011, at 8:15 AM, Toby Seiler <[email protected]> wrote: > Jim, > > I think GF has a point about how politics work with financing. The money > chase by an inventor seems both predetermined and rigged, even more so where > large sums of money are involved. > > Re Range Fuels, a report says; "The first step converts the biomass to > synthesis gas and the second step converts the gas to ethanol." > > Does the first step make producer gas or syngas? Apparently the technical > review didn't know the difference or was asked to overlook it and it makes > about a 10x difference. > > Good day, > > Toby Seiler > Seilertechco > > > > Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 20:12:24 -0500 > From: GF <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Gasification] Range Fuels Closing Plant > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > > Jim, > I cannot offer "proof" of the truth of my statement, If I could, I would > not. because I really don't care. I could write a book on the subject to show > people how they are being manipulated and "shaken down" by a well organized > creed who has taken over the western world. > No doubt with the passing of time you might see it. The worst is yet to come. > The sad thing is we fully deserve it. > GF > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jim Leach <[email protected]> > To: 'Discussion of biomass pyrolysis and gasification' > <[email protected]>; [email protected] > Sent: Wed, Jan 26, 2011 12:18 pm > Subject: Re: [Gasification] Range Fuels Closing Plant > > > That is a pretty nasty and bold claim, do you have any facts to back that up? > > JAMES T. LEACH, P.E. > President > > DANA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. > 32242 Paseo Adelanto, Suite D > San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 > Ph 949-496-6516 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting 949-496-6516 > end_of_the_skype_highlighting > Fx 949-496-8133 > Mobile 949-933-6518 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting 949-933-6518 > end_of_the_skype_highlighting > > > > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of GF > Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 10:41 AM > To: [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Gasification] Range Fuels Closing Plant > > > > Government Grants and Ethanol. > > > I think we all agree on: THE GREAT ETHANOL SWINDLE. > This is where our tax dollars are diverted into non economic production > of a fuel additive which supposedly saves us from climate change. > The primary players in this scam have made sure their methods together with > the cash cow they have created ?REMAINS INTACT? > The last thing they desire is a new and more efficient system to be > discovered or adopted. > So how do they protect their interests? > Quite simply, take control of any new committees responsible for the > selection of grants which might produce an alternative to their scam. > How could such a wasteful and useless system be chosen for Federal Investment > unless the people on the committee had an agenda which also included the > grant seekers. > The naivety of those who believe that poor judgment on the part of the > perpetrators is the primary cause of such ?losses? should have their voting > rights revoked. > There are no accidents or poor judgment in politics. That is the excuse > generated by a stupid and trusting electorate. > It will not matter how merit worthy your claim is for grant money, it will > not be considered worthy if it challenges an established ?funded? system. > It might be chosen if it has ?floors?, in which case, be prepared to share it > with at least one member of the committee. > > GF > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mark Ludlow <[email protected]> > To: 'Discussion of biomass pyrolysis and gasification' > <[email protected]> > Sent: Tue, Jan 25, 2011 11:20 am > Subject: Re: [Gasification] Range Fuels Closing Plant > > > > Tom writes: Wonder why anyone stays in this field? > > Reply: It pays well. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Gasification mailing list > > to Send a Message to the list, use the email address > [email protected] > > to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page > http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/gasification_lists.bioenergylists.org > > for more Gasifiers, News and Information see our web site: > http://gasifiers.bioenergylists.org/
_______________________________________________ Gasification mailing list to Send a Message to the list, use the email address [email protected] to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/gasification_lists.bioenergylists.org for more Gasifiers, News and Information see our web site: http://gasifiers.bioenergylists.org/
