Doug,
you wrote,
the Mk2 Mega Class gasifier was able to make enough gas to supply nine of these 
engines flat out, so testing one at a time placed no stress on the gas supply.


How do they achieve this kind of turndown ratio, apparently at least nine to 
one?

Luke Gardner
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: doug.williams 
  To: Discussion of biomass pyrolysis and gasification 
  Sent: Saturday, February 26, 2011 12:03 PM
  Subject: Re: [Gasification] ideal wood gas engine


  Hi Henri and Colleagues,

  Henri, you advise us of the engine details, but what is to be your 
application?

  My installation plans to turbo charge a 350 chev engine c/w positive 
displacement pump for the gasifier

  It would appear from making such an effort, that you do seek performance, and 
I can offer a few comments that might be of interest for further development if 
you have the capability.

  In April 2004, my associates of that time in Winnipeg were rebuilding Chev 
502 "Crate Engines" to maximize their design for producer gas. One of the team 
specialized in tuning these engines for racing purposes, and he was set up with 
all new Dyno equipment for the project. Apart from all the polishing of ports, 
new pistons, etc, the emphasis was on the cam shafts, and these were re-made 
and tested intensively making them the most expensive cam shafts in N.America, 
according to the guy who was paying the bills! 

  There were six of these engines built, and before anyone asks, I have no idea 
where they went to, due to the security breach and loss of integrity to the 
whole project. I did however see them working up on the dyno, and all I can say 
is that I have never seen so much grunt come out of an engine on producer gas 
before at 3,200 RPM. As interesting as this may be, all the other issues of 
exhaust emissions,etc, were not addressed, but only one factor made it possible 
to really allow this type of test.

  Engines can perform outstandingly on producer gas, if purpose built. The 
engine performance though, can only be attained if the gas making process can 
meet the engine demand for gas without changing it's basic standard gas 
analysis. In the Winnipeg project, the Mk2 Mega Class gasifier was able to make 
enough gas to supply nine of these engines flat out, so testing one at a time 
placed no stress on the gas supply.

  From a practical perspective which applies to most of us working with 
producer gas, we are surrounded with perfectly good engines that run well for 
most applications on producer gas. We as individuals with specialist 
capability, can modify and rebuild any of these engines that push normal 
performance boundaries, just the same as for liquid fuels. For the rest of us 
without that talent, we can only speculate as to the potentials of doing 
burn-outs down Main Street on Friday nights (:-)

  Now back to the wood pile (for heating).

  Doug Williams,
  Fluidyne Gasification.



------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  Gasification mailing list

  to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
  [email protected]

  to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
  
http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/gasification_lists.bioenergylists.org

  for more Gasifiers,  News and Information see our web site:
  http://gasifiers.bioenergylists.org/
_______________________________________________
Gasification mailing list

to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
[email protected]

to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/gasification_lists.bioenergylists.org

for more Gasifiers,  News and Information see our web site:
http://gasifiers.bioenergylists.org/

Reply via email to