On Tue, 3 Jan 2012 19:55:30 -0600, Greg wrote in message 
<CAH4eSNqU=n93fofasmanhah75qxv_dfp70nykgmu7ytx1za...@mail.gmail.com>:
> 
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 9:19 AM, Arnt Karlsen <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Sat, 31 Dec 2011 11:31:27 -0600, Greg wrote in message
> > <CAH4eSNoE5J=VUUQdA434Hj+71UgqADbJfGy1Bte=4d4hbdy...@mail.gmail.com>:
> >
> >> Hi Arnt,
> >>
> >> Yes I do, have GCMS results of before and after, (and blotter
> >> tests as well) both support the internal tar flare design, to be
> >> an advantage.
> >
> > ..urls? ;o)
> 
> Sorry, not on the web, just papers. 

..that you'll publish once they're ready?

> But, as I said, the internal flare DOES indeed work, and very well,

..aye, I was just wondering how well. ;o)

> Thanks Arnt.
> 
> Greg


-- 
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt Karlsen
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
  Scenarios always come in sets of three: 
  best case, worst case, and just in case.

_______________________________________________
Gasification mailing list

to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
[email protected]

to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/gasification_lists.bioenergylists.org

for more Gasifiers,  News and Information see our web site:
http://gasifiers.bioenergylists.org/

Reply via email to