Dear Ron I have been following your Emails with Bert with interest, having been involved in many failed gasification projects, and a few that have succeeded (Community Power Corporation in Littleton).
<><><> Biochar adds a new dimension to practical gasification projects. If there was a strong positive demand from agriculture for Biochar, we could be home free, but that has yet to be established and may not occur in our lifetimes. There are still unanswered questions about Biochar and I hope to get answers this Spring. <><><> The easiest method of making Biochar is to take a dense pyramidal pile of dry wood ( for instance chopped up tree brush after a tree is felled) and light it on top. As charcoal forms in the first layer, it ignites the cellulose volatiles coming up for the second layer.... and eventually the whole pile (or stove or can) is full of charcoal. This could be called "AutoPyrolysis", since it is the heat from burning the cellulose in each chip that converts the lignin in the chip to charcoal. And it also leaves a clean, combustible gas as a by product which should be converted to electric power. I have measured the charcoal production rate for wood chips at various conversion rates and moisture contents. It can be as high as 25% with bone dry chips, but 20% is a safe number for 15% MC chips. <><><> This charcoal is low in volatiles, since the need for a flame limits the lowest temperature practical to about 500C. Is that good or bad? What is the most effective size for charcoal in soil? Wood chips make a convenient size, but the product is friable and possibly 1/4 " or smaller could be better for growing plants. <><><> I hope to test a number of these questions this spring. Your pal, Tom Reed (I wish we could play Racketball 1-2 times a week. I'm rusting out!) Thomas B Reed 280 Hardwick Rd Barre, MA 01005 508 353 7841 On Dec 24, 2012, at 4:03 PM, [email protected] wrote: > Bert etal > > Thanks for the update. It is good to hear that your facility will be > started up again. Probably would have been possible in Kansas, if we > accurately accounted for the social costs of natural gas. > > For others, EPC means Engineering, Procurement, and Construction. > > Please let us know when and where we can follow - after you are up and > running again. > > Ron > > From: "Bert Bennett" <[email protected]> > To: [email protected], [email protected], "Tom Miles" > <[email protected]> > Cc: "biochar-policy" <[email protected]>, > [email protected], "Jon Orr" <[email protected]>, > "Monique Pope" <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, December 24, 2012 12:32:10 PM > Subject: RE: [biochar] ICM gasifier project comes to a close > > Tom, Ron, Lists, > > As our friends have noticed, ICM is planning to decommission our > demonstration facility over the next six months. And although we are sad to > see that part of our development come to an end … it also marks the > completion of our “first phase” efforts to successfully demonstrate ICM’s > Gasification and Biochar Production Technology. The good news for ICM and > future customers is that we are planning to move much of the demonstration > gasifier to our first fully commercial biomass-to-energy project. ICM and > its international EPC partner have now begun to actively engineer that > facility, which will be based in a region with incentives that promote > renewable energy and combined heat and power applications (and do not have > access to low cost natural gas). We are working very hard to fast track our > first commercial plant and plan to be back online by early 2014. > > To add to Tom’s comments, it is not easy to finance first-of-its-find > biomass-to-energy projects, no matter how good the technology may be. When > we first began construction of our Harvey County facility in 2009 we had > hoped to eventually be able to move that unit to Harvey County’s nearby > Transfer Station. The goal was to eventually provide a waste-to-energy > solution for Harvey County, plus provide a dedicated platform that could, on > a regular basis, switch to biomass and continue supporting biochar research > and production efforts. Unfortunately, very low cost natural gas has made it > very difficult to negotiate a power purchase agreement that could support the > financial requirements associated with a first commercial deployment. We are > confident, however, that after we have deployed multiple units that we can > once again be able to return to our friends in Harvey County with a scalable > solution that meets their needs and that traditional financial institutions > will readily support. > > As a friend of Harvey County’s very progressive Commissioners, County > Supervisor and Transfer Station Superintendent, I cannot say enough to > express ICMs gratitude for their support and vision … > > Bert > > > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 4:44 PM > To: [email protected]; Tom Miles; Bert Bennett > Cc: biochar-policy; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [biochar] ICM gasifier project comes to a close > > Tom, Lists, Bert > > Because this sounded pretty bad news for biochar, I have done a little > looking around. I eventually talked to the key individual at ICM - Dr. > Bert Bennett, who has agreed to comment on your news story below. > > Bert gave a very informative plenary about this specific ICM plant at > Sonoma. Anyone can watch a good 15 minute video found at: > http://2012.biochar.us.com/conference-videos > > I also found a shorter similar 5 minute audio from 2011 > > http://domesticfuel.com/2011/05/10/icm-spotlights-biomass-gasification-at-conference/ > > There are also plenty of news releases on the facility - all I saw were > very complementary. > > Because Bert has agreed to give some more background, I won't say more > except to say this should be by no means the end of the biochar story from > this 350 person company, that is operating worldwide. > > Ron > From: "Tom Miles" <[email protected]> > To: [email protected], "Discussion of biomass pyrolysis and > gasification" <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 11:08:46 AM > Subject: [biochar] ICM gasifier project comes to a close > > > The article below demonstrates how difficult it Is to convert urban residues > to heat, power and biochar in today’s economy. > > I observed that technically the ICM gasifier worked very well. The ICM > gasifier can take wood, straw or corn stover and convert it to gas and > biochar in various proportions. It makes a good quality biochar that has been > tested in various locations. I was impressed by the fuel flexibility. > > The economic challenges are manifold: if it is not feasible to generate and > sell heat or power and biochar at one location then you can’t generate the > cash flow necessary to run the plant. We hope that Bert Bennett and his team > at ICM can find a suitable customer. > > Tom > > ICM gasifier project comes to a close > By Ashley Bergner Newton Kansan > December 20. 2012 11:00AM > www.thekansan.com/article/20121220/NEWS/121229996 > > > The decommissioning of ICM's prototype gasifier at the Harvey County Transfer > Station marks an end — or at least a postponement — of the county's vision of > a viable waste-to-energy system. > At Monday's county commission meeting, officials announced the project would > be coming to a close, and within six months, all the equipment will be taken > down. > > "It would bring to a halt our hopes ... of what would be a waste-to-energy > facility," said John Waltner, county administrator. > ICM’s Biomass Gasification System, also known as a “gasifier,” burns trash > and converts it to synthetic gas, which can be used to generate power in > industrial and commercial settings. ICM tested thousands of tons of different > types of waste, which are referred to as “feedstocks.” Feedstocks tested > included wood chips, wheat straw and refuse-derived fuel (this includes junk > mail, cardboard and other paper products thrown away). > > Using a gasifier to convert Harvey County trash into energy had once appeared > to be a possibility. The Harvey County facility likely would have needed to > burn 90 tons of trash per day, a number officials had thought the county > could reach. > ICM plans to try to market the technology in a different area, perhaps > overseas. > Despite the county's disappointment the project wasn't ultimately viable here > in Harvey County, they said their experience working with ICM was positive. > > "It really has been just a terrific exercise for us," Waltner said. > > Commission chair Marge Roberson agreed."It feels really good that Harvey > County had the tenacity to push to take a good, hard look at doing something > with trash other than putting it in the ground," she said. "I absolutely do > not regret any moment we've spent with this partnership." > > Waltner does believe the technology will be prove to be viable in the future. > > "They're going to be successful," he said of the company. "This is something > that's going to happen." > > > __._,_.___ > Reply via web post > Reply to sender > Reply to group > Start a New Topic > Messages in this topic (1) > Recent Activity: > New Members 3 > Visit Your Group > <image001.gif> > Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use • Send us > Feedback > . > > __,_._,___ > > > Click here to report this email as spam. > _______________________________________________ > Gasification mailing list > > to Send a Message to the list, use the email address > [email protected] > > to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page > http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/gasification_lists.bioenergylists.org > > for more Gasifiers, News and Information see our web site: > http://gasifiers.bioenergylists.org/
_______________________________________________ Gasification mailing list to Send a Message to the list, use the email address [email protected] to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/gasification_lists.bioenergylists.org for more Gasifiers, News and Information see our web site: http://gasifiers.bioenergylists.org/
