“  I think its safe to say that we collectively agree that interfering with the 
long cycle like we have is bad.   The question I pose is this.  By how many 
years is it acceptable to short circuit the short cycle?”

 

Well, from what I read, about 25% of all petroleum goes into non-fuel uses;  
eg: plastics.  To the degree that they don’t biodegrade, doesn’t that put a LOT 
of carbon bearing material back into your “long cycle”, taking it totally out 
of the “short cycle”?

 

Regarding the “short cycle”:

  Isn’t the whole forest thing in a state of equilibrium already, except for 
CHANGES in forestation practices?

 

Pete Stanaitis

-----------------

From: Gasification [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Mark Elliott Ludlow
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2016 1:56 PM
To: 'Discussion of biomass pyrolysis and gasification'
Subject: Re: [Gasification] Biochar - Carbon Negative?

 

Hi Luke,

A very nice way to in include an intuitive time integral in our reckoning!

 

Best, Mark

 

From: Gasification [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Luke Gardner
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2016 10:19 AM
To: Discussion of biomass pyrolysis and gasification 
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Gasification] Biochar - Carbon Negative?

 

Karve,

I agree, fundamentally.   The way I see it is that there are a few carbon 
cycles that are happening on this third rock. And its important to keep the 
distinction between them.  for simplicity's sake lets just look at two of the 
cycles and call them the long cycle and the short cycle.  The long cycle locks 
up carbon and traps it within the earth n the form of hydrocarbons, and through 
the billions of years carbon cycles from earth to air, and and back again.  
Then there is the short cycle, in which the carbon is not trapped underground 
in grand quantities for grand periods of time.  This short cycle it locks up 
carbon within the biomass on the surface of the earth for short periods of 
time.  I pose this question... what is the average length of time carbon is 
trapped in biomass.  On the west coast in the US carbon can be trapped for 
thousands of years in the wood of a once great temperate rain forest.  In the 
Midwest- not so much more like an annual event. I think it is important to 
understand the lag time involved, the effect of burning something that will 
grow again in one year, is far different from burning something that will take 
a thousand years to regrow.  A year from now one act would be nearly carbon 
neutral, whereas the other would be 999 years not so carbon neutral.  Consider 
this to be a “carbon lag time”.  While this “lag” is in effect there is more 
carbon in the air than there should be... and that is what the real concern is 
all about.  

   Burning biomass may induce a portion of the carbon into the long cycle, and 
burning fossil fuels injects nearly all carbon from the long cycle into the 
short cycle.  By burning fossil fuels we are short circuiting the long cycle 
and end up with more carbon in the air than should be – today.  Also by burning 
biomass we short circuit the short cycle and end up with more carbon in the air 
than should be - today.

  I think its safe to say that we collectively agree that interfering with the 
long cycle like we have is bad.   The question I pose is this.  By how many 
years is it acceptable to short circuit the short cycle?

Luke Gardner

 

 

From: Anand Karve <mailto:[email protected]>  

Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2016 1:43 AM

To: Discussion of biomass pyrolysis and gasification 
<mailto:[email protected]>  

Subject: Re: [Gasification] Biochar - Carbon Negative?

 

Dear Doug, 

biomass is formed by the process of photosynthesis. Burning biomass is 
considered to be carbon neutral, because the carbon dioxide produced in this 
process was originally already in the atmosphere before it got sequestered in 
plants by photosynthesis. After being released into the atmosphere by burning, 
it would be sequestered again in plants by photosynthesis. Therefore, the 
carbon dioxide added to the atmosphere is zero. if any of the biomass is 
converted into char and buried into the soil, it creates a negative carbon 
dioxide balance, irrespective of the proportion of char going into the soil.

Yours

A.D.Karve

 

***
Dr. A.D. Karve

Chairman, Samuchit Enviro Tech Pvt Ltd (www.samuchit.com)

Trustee & Founder President, Appropriate Rural Technology Institute (ARTI)

 

On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Doug Williams <[email protected]> 
wrote:

Hi Mark,

You ask:
> After gasification, approximately 5% of the woody biomass remains a biochar
> which sequesters carbon, hence a 'carbon negative' claim can be made.

Qualify which type of gasification, because 5% would only apply to a
high performance gas making system. If however it was a pyrolysing char
making system, about 1/3rd of the fuel weight would be char, but two
thirds would be consumed by combustion to become a CO2 emission. So not
honestly carbon negative in my opinion (other than replacing fossil
carbon). Restoration of the environmental CO2 balance would be a tricky
calculation.

> Alternatively, if the woody waste is left to rot in situ, the carbon
> sequestration is 0% (all carbon is released/transformed into CO2 and other
> gasses).

That fits the normal explanations, we all go back to CO2 and CH4 if
left to rot(:-)

> True?

Truth can be very elastic sided when claims are made about
gasification, so take care to confirm all calculations regarding the
process in question.There is a lot of attention paid to carbon credits
as an intensive to cheat in the Souther Hemisphere, and one should be
careful if included in any proposals.

Doug Williams,
Fluidyne.


_______________________________________________
Gasification mailing list

to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
[email protected]

to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/gasification_lists.bioenergylists.org

for more Gasifiers,  News and Information see our web site:
http://gasifiers.bioenergylists.org/

 

  _____  

_______________________________________________
Gasification mailing list

to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
[email protected]

to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/gasification_lists.bioenergylists.org

for more Gasifiers,  News and Information see our web site:
http://gasifiers.bioenergylists.org/

_______________________________________________
Gasification mailing list

to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
[email protected]

to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/gasification_lists.bioenergylists.org

for more Gasifiers,  News and Information see our web site:
http://gasifiers.bioenergylists.org/

Reply via email to