...and you are absolutely right. Like I said, my method is VERY unscientific. 
;-)

Hey! How 'bout them Cats? Georgia looked like the were going to run all over 
them early, but are now sputtering!

Randy

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Bill Hileman 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Saturday, November 08, 2008 12:06 PM
  Subject: [gatortalk] Re: Who To Root For? And Against?


  I agree except that this particular team that is above us in the BCS needs to 
lose to US.  If they don't lose to us, it doesn't matter.
    -----Original Message-----
    From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of 
Gatornet Admin
    Sent: Saturday, November 08, 2008 11:53 AM
    To: [email protected]
    Subject: [gatortalk] Re: Who To Root For? And Against?
    Importance: Low


    My standard policy is to always hope the teams above us in the BCS loses. 
Period. Scientific? Nah! You want scientific, ask Stacey! :-)

    Randy

      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: Kenneth Beitler 
      To: [email protected] 
      Sent: Saturday, November 08, 2008 11:09 AM
      Subject: [gatortalk] Who To Root For? And Against?


      Gators:

       

      Maybe I am not paying as much attention as I should be (it’s been a busy 
week), but I have to admit that I have been somewhat confused as to who to root 
for today, and in the upcoming weeks.  Of course, I want the scenario that 
helps the Gators most.

       

      Now, I understand that if we don’t win the rest of our games, including 
the SECCG (should we win the East – let’s take nothing for granted), none of 
this matters.  And I also understand that who I root for doesn’t have any 
effect on the outcome in these games.  But I just want to know what best serves 
the Gators, so I can root, and celebrate (or suffer) accordingly.

       

      Take the Texas Tech –- Oklahoma State game tonight.  Normally, I’d root 
for Oklahoma State, since Texas Tech is ranked ahead of us.  But would Oklahoma 
State jump us if they beat Texas Tech?  I tend to think they would not, but who 
knows?  And does the upcoming schedule for either make it better for us if one 
wins over the other?  Oklahoma still must play Oklahoma State and Texas Tech, 
so, should Oklahoma win out, it would be better for us if the teams they beat 
are ranked below us, reducing the likelihood that Oklahoma could jump us.  So I 
am thinking that tonight I need to root for Oklahoma State to beat Texas Tech, 
to take Texas Tech down a few pegs.  Am I wrong about that?

       

      Keep in mind that Texas is still ahead of us in the BCS; if Texas Tech 
loses at some point, it might hurt Texas’ SOS rating, which could only help us.

       

      Now, Alabama – LSU.  Everyone is saying that it would help us to play an 
undefeated Alabama in the SECCG, and I suppose that’s right.  It’s just hard 
for me to root for Nick Saban.  Also, if Alabama were to lose, it would clear 
out another spot ahead of us, so we would move up.  However, I think if Alabama 
loses, we lose control of our own destiny.  We would need to depend on a loss 
by two of the other three teams that are ranked ahead of us: Texas Tech or Penn 
State, or Texas.  We would also have to hope that we don’t get jumped by either 
Oklahoma or USC.  So I think that no matter how badly we dislike Nick Saban, we 
have to hope for his team to batter LSU this afternoon.

       

      So, is this already obvious to everyone else, and I am late to the game 
in thinking about it?  Am I wrong about any of it?

       

      Any feedback would be welcome.

       

       

      Go Gators!!!!

       

      Ken B. (NYC Gator)

       

      

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
GATORS: ONE VOICE ON SATURDAY - NO VOICE ON SUNDAY!
1996 National Football Champions   |   2006 National Basketball Champions
2006 National Football Champions   |   2007 National Basketball Champions
Three Heisman Trophy winners: Steve Spurrier (1966), Danny Wuerffel (1996),
Tim Tebow (2007) - Visit our website at www.gatornet.us
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to