Revive it... it might be good for a lot of us... 

They have talent.  They have confidence.  It will be
up to our defense to negate both.

I'm thinking it will be 45-31 Gators.  


--- Gatornet Admin <[email protected]> wrote:

> 
> Do I need to revive P,D's rant of "Hoke's a Joke!"?
> We were decimated by Nebraska because we had no
> defense.
> 
> Randy Lyons
> Sent wirelessly 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scott Lucas <[email protected]>
> Sent: Sunday, December 14, 2008 9:28 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [gatortalk] Re: Bleh!
> 
> 
> We didn't think Tommy "TD" Frazier and his Husker
> boys
> would either...
> 
> I am cautiously optimistic... but a team that has
> put
> up that many points and has been that successful has
> a
> huge boost by confidence and could very well play
> above their normal potential because of that boost. 
> Its one of those intangibles... 
> 
> 
> --- Wanda Barry <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > I sorta wanted him to win, but in a more realistic
> > sense, I didn't.  And 
> > this is why...In the last decade Heisman winners
> are
> > 2&6, win-loss, in their 
> > bowl games.  To date, the Heisman winners are on a
> > 3-game losing streak with 
> > Reggie Bush losing in '05, Troy Smith losing to
> the
> > Mighty Gators in '06 and 
> > our beloved TT losing (embarassingly) to Michigan
> > last year.  So now 
> > Bradford has to overcome the jinx of Heisman
> losers
> > in the final game of 
> > what will likely be the last game of his college
> > career.  And on that note, 
> > I hope TT not winning tonight will encourage him
> to
> > return next year for the 
> > eluded undefeated season and his 2nd Heisman with
> a
> > win in his bowl game, 
> > which would hopefully be for a national
> > championship.
> > 
> > The fact that TT received the most 1st place
> votes,
> > but Bradford won the 
> > most districts means the voting for Heisman is as
> > messed up as the BCS.  I 
> > really don't think the defenses in the Big 12 are
> as
> > strong as in the SEC 
> > and that's why OU was able to have the most points
> > scored by a college team 
> > in history for a season.  Plus, we all know they
> > needed the style points to 
> > move up in the BCS and beat out Texas Tech and
> Texas
> > for the South 
> > championship.  I really don't think they'll score
> > 60+ points on the 
> > Gators!!!
> > 
> > ON TO MIAMI AND GO GATORS !!!!!!
> > Wanda
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: <[email protected]>
> > To: <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2008 9:10 PM
> > Subject: [gatortalk] Re: Bleh!
> > 
> > 
> > > It's okay.
> > >
> > > Tim will win it again next year, as he leads us
> to
> > our first undefeated 
> > > season and second consecutive National
> > Championship.
> > >
> > > Go Gators!!!!
> > >
> > > Ken B. (NYC Gator)
> > >
> > > Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone with
> > SprintSpeed
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: "Tracy Gill" <[email protected]>
> > >
> > > Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 21:06:53
> > > To: <[email protected]>
> > > Subject: [gatortalk] Re: Bleh!
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > And do lots of TV shows, guest appearances,
> > speaking engagements, and
> > > banquets.
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [email protected]
> > [mailto:[email protected]] On
> > > Behalf Of [email protected]
> > > Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2008 8:58 PM
> > > To: [email protected]
> > > Subject: [gatortalk] Bleh!
> > >
> > > Congratulations Sam.
> > >
> > > Now take the next month off.
> > >
> > > Go Gators!!!!
> > >
> > > Ken B. (NYC Gator)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>
> 
> 


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
GATORS: ONE VOICE ON SATURDAY - NO VOICE ON SUNDAY!
1996 National Football Champions   |   2006 National Basketball Champions
2006 National Football Champions   |   2007 National Basketball Champions
Three Heisman Trophy winners: Steve Spurrier (1966), Danny Wuerffel (1996),
Tim Tebow (2007) - Visit our website at www.gatornet.us
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to