I think it is the coaches not having the confidence in the younger
receivers, so for the most part we are running a 1 or 2 WR set.  It is hard
to see on TV since they don't show the whole play developing (must be part
of that media blackout thingy), but the times you can see our receivers
quite often they are simply there to pull the safeties to one side of the
field or to begin blocking.  Even in our 5 wide sets, we rarely look past
Cooper and Hernandez.  
The whole team is playing tight.  Coaches and players.  It is a game, go out
have fun.  I mean after all, according to the MiamiPalmBeachPostHerald news
this morning:

    "But the truth is, Tim Tebow isn't deserving of all this Heisman talk.
Not this year, anyway. Not when he's having an ordinary season on a team
that hasn't lived up to expectations."

At 6-0, ranked #1, we are just ordinary...

 
Ken K
MNGator
 

  _____  

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of Steve McKibben
Sent: Friday, October 23, 2009 11:59 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [gatortalk] Re: Tebow and pass effiency


To be honest, I haven't seen much evidence of that - at least not since the
Kentucky game (if then). He either hasn't had much time, or he's been hot to
tuck and run.

--- On Fri, 10/23/09, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:





What about the new QB coach wanting tebow to check 3rd and 4th receivers? 
 

-------- Original Message --------


There has been a lot of discussion on our passing game, what's wrong/right
with it, etc.

Any criticisms are usually met, at least once, with it being pointed out
that UF/Tebow are #1 in passing efficiency, and therefore we can't be doing
all that badly.

I don't know if it's down to Tebow's "look once, twice - run" mentality,
Meyer's obsession with ball security, or what, but I believe that the pass
efficiency rating is, at least partially, a byproduct of perhaps being too
careful with the ball.

That sounds like a silly concept, but consider the following: When did our
offense really seem to find it's feet last year? Most point to the second
half of the Arky game. And a great deal of that spark came from the long
runs from Demps and Rainey, I know, but those may have been influenced to
some degree by the Hogs' defenders having to concern themselves with a
bolder Tebow.

Bolder how? I suggest that throwing the pick that he did in the first half,
which ended a long string of attempts without one, may have "freed" Tim to
take more chances passing the ball.

>From what I've observed, this season Tim rarely passes the ball on timing
routes - he seems to need to see separation first, before he'll pass. When
he doesn't, and pulls the ball down and runs, there is no chance for an INT,
and the pass efficiency rating doesn't suffer, but as a result we may miss
out on some big plays for the sake of staying out of bad ones.

Again, that may be (and has been) ascribed to a number of reasons, from a
lack of confidence/coordination with the receivers, lingering effects from
his concussion, or just a conservative nature inherent to Tim or instilled
in him by the coaches. 

I'm not saying that any of our team is playing for stats at the expense of
production, I just feel that the sometimes ultra-conservative way we've seen
the passing game implemented may be as big of a factor in achieving that one
particular statistic, and as such it may not be the best way to judge how
effective our passing game has been up to this point in time.

I hope that by Sunday morning we'll all feel better about how we're passing
the ball, and this post will look foolish in hindsight (ducking!).      








--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
GATORS: ONE VOICE ON SATURDAY - NO VOICE ON SUNDAY!
1996 National Football Champions   |   2006 National Basketball Champions
2006 National Football Champions   |   2007 National Basketball Champions
2008 National Football Champions   |   
Three Heisman Trophy winners: Steve Spurrier (1966), Danny Wuerffel (1996),
Tim Tebow (2007) - Visit our website at www.gatornet.us
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to