What's wrong with 'four-play?'  It's done all the time in tennis.
 A. Leon Polhill, Gator
"I was gratified to be able to answer promptly, and I did.
I said I didn't know." - Mark Twain 




________________________________
From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Mon, May 3, 2010 4:21:38 PM
Subject: [gatortalk] Fw: [gatornews] [SUN]: 2010/05/01 23:55 ---- NCAA should 
find way to make four play-in games fun [Dooley]

In response to his column below, I wrote to Pat Dooley.

I'll share it with you, and hope I am not the first in the McKibben era to be 
disciplined.

Go Gators!!!!

Ken B. (NYC Gator)


This is the text:

**********
Hello Pat:

In your column today, you wrote:

----------
OK, there you have it. We'll leave it to CBS to come up with a catchy name for 
our event. The Little Dance? March Mania? The Pre-Dance? 

It would be, it could be, fun.
----------

If you are looking for a fun, catchy name for the small pre-tournament to 
determine which four teams make it into the big tournament, I suggest 
"Four-Play."

Do you think CBS would go for it?


Sincerely,
Ken Beitler
**********

Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone with SprintSpeed
________________________________

From: Shane Ford <[email protected]> 
Date: Mon, 3 May 2010 10:16:01 -0500
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: [gatornews] [SUN]: 2010/05/01 23:55 ---- NCAA should find way to make 
four play-in games fun [Dooley]

NCAA should find way to make four play-in games fun

By Pat Dooley
Gainesville SUN Columnist
Published: Saturday, May 1, 2010 at 11:55 p.m. 
Last Modified: Saturday, May 1, 2010 at 11:55 p.m. 
 
 
 
Now that we have an answer, there are more questions.
The NCAA has backed away from the ridiculous 96-team field that would have 
damaged the game and decided instead to go with 68 teams, as so many of us 
thought would be a better solution. Once CBS and Turner went all Dwight Howard 
to swat ESPN's shot, we were spared the bracket from hell.
For now.
It's probably coming down the road and the road is neither long nor winding. 
Still, this year this is our tournament, 68 teams with four play-in games.
How will this all take shape? Where, when and who will we be looking at in 
March? Why do I ask so many questions?
“The committee will have to study any variety of options and certainly the 
notion of looking at options involving the last at-large teams in would be one 
possible option,” NCAA vice president Greg Shaheen told The Associated Press. 
“We would expect the committee to examine all of the options.”
Great. Now let's present a word that usually doesn't get bounced around at 
these committee meetings.
Fun.
As in, “Have some fun with it.”
Let's start with the who.
Who will play in the play-in games that will be required to get the field down 
to 64? I don't think it should be the bottom seeds. Currently, the bottom two 
teams in the seeding play the one game in Dayton on a Tuesday. Quick name the 
winner of this year's play-in game. Of any play-in game.
Nobody cares (except the two schools involved) which team will be served up as 
a sacrificial lamb to a No. 1 seed. It adds nothing to the tournament. It 
doesn't even feel like the tournament. The NCAA's Web site doesn't even have 
the play-in game on its official bracket. As I recall, I watched NIT games that 
night rather than the play-in game.
Instead, let's take the bottom eight at-large teams, the ones who just made it 
inside the bubble. Four games that will feel a lot more special and have a lot 
more intrigue than Sam Houston State vs. East Tennessee State. Instead, we 
would have had games such as Mississippi State-Illinois and Arizona 
State-Virginia Tech this year.
You can argue that it's not fair for better seeds to have to play the extra 
game. Don't care. It will be fun.
The when probably won't change. I can't see a way to play a traditional 
tournament with the Thursday-Saturday and Friday-Sunday games unless the 
play-in games take place on Tuesday.
So let's get to the where.
I put the question on my Twitter page and the responses were interesting. Some 
Tweeps liked the play-in game to take place at the Final Four site. I can't see 
that. The arenas are too big. Next year's Final Four is at Reliant Stadium in 
Houston. We still don't know how well-attended these games are going to be, and 
the last thing we want to see is tumbleweeds blowing through the empty stands.
But I wouldn't rule it out.
Certainly, I don't want to see the games played on campuses. That would make it 
feel like the NIT. And I think the best way to do this would be to have one 
site with four games to give it the big-time feel of a major event. You could 
play at noon, 3 p.m., 6 p.m. and 9 p.m. I think I will ask for that day off.
Also, you would make sure the national media would be there, Tweeting and 
blogging like crazy. What self-respecting, major news organization wouldn't 
want to be at such an event? It probably will end up being held at two sites 
but I believe it would be more appealing at one.
Because schools will be traveling from all over the United States, it needs to 
be a central location. If Florida is playing in this mini-tournament, I 
recommend Hawaii. Hey, a guy has to try.
Here is my real recommendation and I'm sure the committee is looking to me for 
advice.
We need a major city. Check. The arena can't be too big, but it has to be able 
to handle a good-sized crowd. It needs to be in a place where they love their 
hoops.
How about Hinkle Fieldhouse in Indianapolis?
It has tradition (if you don't know by now, they filmed part of “Hoosiers” 
there) and seats around 11,000. Great city. Home to many Final Fours (the next 
one is in 2015). Basketball is a religion in Indiana.
OK, there you have it. We'll leave it to CBS to come up with a catchy name for 
our event. The Little Dance? March Mania? The Pre-Dance?
It would be, it could be, fun.
For us, anyway.
Contact Pat Dooley at 352-374-5053 or at [email protected]. You can listen 
to The Pat Dooley Show weekdays from 4-6 p.m. on 104.9 FM. And follow at 
Twitter.com/Pat_Dooley.
 -- 
GATORS: ONE VOICE ON SATURDAY - NO VOICE ON SUNDAY!
1996 National Football Champions | 2006 National Basketball Champions
2006 National Football Champions | 2007 National Basketball Champions
2008 National Football Champions | 
Three Heisman Trophy winners: Steve Spurrier (1966), Danny Wuerffel (1996),
Tim Tebow (2007) - Visit our website at www.gatornet.us -- 
GATORS: ONE VOICE ON SATURDAY - NO VOICE ON SUNDAY!
1996 National Football Champions | 2006 National Basketball Champions
2006 National Football Champions | 2007 National Basketball Champions
2008 National Football Champions | 
Three Heisman Trophy winners: Steve Spurrier (1966), Danny Wuerffel (1996),
Tim Tebow (2007) - Visit our website at www.gatornet.us

-- 
GATORS: ONE VOICE ON SATURDAY - NO VOICE ON SUNDAY!
1996 National Football Champions   |   2006 National Basketball Champions
2006 National Football Champions   |   2007 National Basketball Champions
2008 National Football Champions   |   
Three Heisman Trophy winners: Steve Spurrier (1966), Danny Wuerffel (1996),
Tim Tebow (2007) - Visit our website at www.gatornet.us

Reply via email to