Seems reasonable. I agree.
On Jan 16, 2008, at 23:39, Mark Reinhold wrote:
Joe Darcy proposed the JDK 6 Project on 14 December [1].
Kelly O'Hair called for the Build Group to vote on sponsoring this
Project on 7 January [2], and in due course that vote passed [3].
The interim governance rules [4] require that a Group vote to sponsor
a proposed Project within 14 days, so strictly speaking this vote was
invalid. (I'm sure this was an innocent mistake on Kelly's part, most
likely related to Sun's week-long break over the holidays.)
Rather than ask Joe to resubmit the JDK 6 Project Proposal, I hereby
request the Interim Governance Board to recognize the Build Group's
sponsorship vote as valid despite its tardiness.
GB members: Please indicate your agreement (or not) in replies to this
message.
- Mark
[1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/announce/2007-December/
000051.html
[2] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/build-dev/2008-January/
000659.html
[3] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/build-dev/2008-January/
000696.html
[4] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/
