At the risk of picking a barely-healed scab, isn't TCK licensing outside of the scope of OpenJDK governance?
I understand how --- if you are so inclined --- you can start pulling at the threads to the point where every issue related to Java can be conflated with OpenJDK governance. But I don't see how that is going to be a particularly useful or constructive exercise. > [Switching to gb-discuss only] > > On 6 Feb 2011, at 15:33, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: > > > If true, this seems like an excellent thing for the new OpenJDK governing > board to address immediately. > > That's actually an excellent test case. I can see that some might argue it > is purely a contractual matter between Oracle and a "customer", but since > maintaining a level playing field requires that the TCK is indeed offered > in a fair, transparent and timely way there should probably be an explicit > statement in the governance concerning the Board's authority to at least > ask questions and preferably intervene in TCK cases.
