It depends on switch design. I tested HA with 3com Switch 3300. A Switch
3300 makes MAC address table on every VLAN separately.

I made three VLANs in a Switch 3300. 

VLAN-MAP

VLAN1-Port1,2,3,4
VLAN2-Port5,6,7,8
VLAN3-Port9,10,11,12

I connected GB-1000s.GB-1000-1 is prior to GB-1000-2.

GB-1000-1-EXT to Port1
GB-1000-2-EXT to Port2
GB-1000-1-PRO to Port5
GB-1000-2-PRO to Port6
GB-1000-1-PSN to Port9
GB-1000-2-PSN to Port10

Switch 3300 could learn HA MAC Address on Port1,5,9. When I forced
GB-1000-1 to offline, Switch 3300 switched HA MAC Address to Port
2,6,10.

I heard the ENTERASYS Vertical Horizon(Formerly the Cabletron
SmartSTACK) can learn same MAC on different VLANS with farmware 2.4.1 or
later and VLAN leaning Configuration in Extended Bridge
Configuration/Device Control Menu setting to IVL. But I haven't tested
it.

I suggest you to check new firmware and release notes of your switch.

/MORI Tomoya

> Graham Jones wrote:
> 
> It would be nice to use a single managed switch configured with two
> VLANs to implement the External and DMZ network connections for each
> GB-1000.  The two switches are then connected together (one cable for
> each VLAN) so that the switches themselves become a fault tolerant
> pair - both VLANs survive even if one switch fails.
> 
> We tested this with one GB-1000 prior to installation at the customer.
> 
> When the GB-1000 is in INIT mode or SLAVE mode, each of its interfaces
> (visible via their respective configuration IP addresses) has a
> different MAC address - so a switch with two VLANs works correctly.
> 
> When the GB-1000 is in MASTER mode ALL its interfaces (now
> implementing the desired virtual IP addresses) show the same MAC
> address.  The switch with two VLAN then fails to operate properly
> because it cannot handle the same MAC address across two separate
> VLANs.
> 
> So we have to connect one switch on the DMZ and the other on the
> External network - which is OK until a switch fails.  This would
> completely break one network and neither GB-1000 will be able to see
> any of its beacons on that network - so both GB-1000 will go to INIT
> mode - and nothing works until somebody replaces the faulty switch.
> 
> OK so we can work around this with more cheap switches or hubs so that
> there is no single point of failure on any network.
> 
> But it would be REALLY GOOD if the GB-1000 when in master mode had 4
> different MAC addresses, one for each network interface.  Can this be
> done?

Reply via email to