At 02:49 AM 11/22/01 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >--------------------- Attention ----------------------------- >A digest version of this list is now available. >Send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with the following message: >subscribe gb-users-digest your_email_address >Then unsubscribe from this list. >------------------------------------------------------------- >GNAT Box User Forum http://www.gnatbox.com/cgi-bin/Ultimate.cgi >Send postings to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Access the list archives at: http://www.gnatbox.com/gb-users/ >------------------------------------------------------------- >Has anyone run a similar setup? >This will probably be confusing but I will use x.x.x.x for fictitious >public addresses and use the full address for the private ones. > >IF1 EXT x.x.1.1/24 >IF2 PSN x.x.2.1/24 > >A route on the outside routes x.x.2.0/24 to x.x.1.1 >x.x.2.0/24 defined as an IP Passthrough network. > >All the x.x.2.0 traffic basically doesn't use nat at all and filters >are defined in the IP Passthrough filter section. > >Now the tricky part. Bind a private IP to IF2 say 192.168.1.1/24 > >So it now looks like. > >IF2 PSN x.x.2.1 and 192.168.1.1 > >The question is will the private addresses work fine using NAT on that >same interface?
as far as i know it should work...
