On Tue, 11 Jun 2002, Vaughn Thurman - Swift Systems Inc wrote: > Thanks for the words of caution! Do you feel that spamcop was helpful on > it's own?
> From: "Chris Green" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Be careful with the spam filtering. Keep a close eye on the email its > rejecting for a while. I had to drop all of the services except spamcop > as most of them were too overzealous in their blocking. Most businesses > cannot afford to miss any important email. That gets back to one of my earlier points, which is you want to have management buy-in that there will be some mail rejected that you want to recieve. We made the decision that the trade-off was worth it. We also monitor what gets rejected. Ive got a perl script that read the syslog files and sends email with whats been rejected. We've had customer systems show up on ORDB for having an open relay. Thats pretty well defined and pretty easy to fix. The problem is that something like a SpamCop listing is much harder to resolve. This is the reason the GnatBox really needs a whitelist to overide the DNSBL listings when you cant fix the problem in a timely way. Joe Matuscak Rohrer Corporation 717 Seville Road Wadsworth, Ohio 44281 (330)335-1541 [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe to the digest version first unsubscribe, then e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archive of the last 1000 messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
