That is correct, assuming that the server doesn't need to make secondary connections back to the client. For HTTP this will work, I don't know enough about the PC-anywhere protocol to guess if it will work without a static mapping. Necessary or not, it will not hurt to have the static mapping there.
/Arne -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: Mike Burden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sendt: 24. juli 2002 16:18 Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Emne: RE: SV: [gb-users] Static address > -----Original Message----- > From: Dan Swartzendruber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 10:09 AM > To: Felix Nielsen > Cc: David Mulligan; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: SV: [gb-users] Static address > > > On Wed, 24 Jul 2002, Felix Nielsen wrote: > > > Hi > > > > If You only have inbound tunnels static maps are not needed. > > this doesn't sound right. if you are using EXT aliases and tunneling > to a PRO system, you need to have a static map to have the return > packets come from the correct EXT address, no? No, the GNAT Box will handle that automatically. The static mapping is only needed to force the IP address of an outbound connection. Mike Burden Lynk Systems http://www.lynk.com (616)532-4985 [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe to the digest version first unsubscribe, then e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archive of the last 1000 messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe to the digest version first unsubscribe, then e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archive of the last 1000 messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
