I was counting on the webserver acting like a proxy g/w. But if you don't recommend this, port 1433 it is then.
S -----Original Message----- From: Chris Green [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 January 2003 15:41 To: 'Gnatbox' Cc: 'Reza Shahidi' Subject: RE: [gb-users] GB1000 - DMZ Question So instead of opening a highly restricted port 1433 only port, you are going to expose the machine completely by plugging it in directly? Sounds naove to me. Chris Green -----Original Message----- From: Reza Shahidi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 9:22 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [gb-users] GB1000 - DMZ Question Hi All, I am planning to put a webserver on the DMZ which would need access to a SQL server containing highly confidential data on the Private network. I am rather against opening ports on the firewall to allow traffic flow. Instead I was thinking of physically connecting the webserver and the SQL server through NIC, putting in place MAC address restrictions. Is that good or naive of me!? Cheers, Shahidi --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe to the digest version first unsubscribe, then e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archive of the last 1000 messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe to the digest version first unsubscribe, then e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archive of the last 1000 messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
