Chris, I think you'll find that one of the new features in the 3.7 release will address this situation.
Paul On Wednesday, May 18, 2005 at 13:30, Chris Green wrote: >I understand that, but if I could BGP I wouldn't be asking about the >firewall. ;) This is a Business DSL line with 4 IP's we are leaving for a >bonded T1 setup with 16. There is no way to do this at a router. I'll >tinker with the gnatbox and give it a shot with two EXT interfaces to see >what happens. > >Thanks, > >Chris > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Dan Swartzendruber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2005 12:01 PM >To: Chris Green >Cc: [email protected] >Subject: RE: [gb-users] Two EXT interfaces for transitioning ISP's > >At 12:58 PM 5/18/2005, Chris Green wrote: >>It is my experience that this would not work, however I could be wrong. In >>the past when I have multi-homed a box between two ISP's with different IP >>subnets all traffic attempted to go out the default gateway, not the >gateway >>from where it originated. Is this not the case here? > >It might be, my question was why you thought that would not work >properly. Most BGP routing at multihomed providers is asymmetric. > >------------------------------------------------------ >To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For additional commands: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Archive: http://archives.gnatbox.com/gb-users/ ------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archive: http://archives.gnatbox.com/gb-users/
