------- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-05-09 09:16 ------- I found something in the archive:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2002-12/msg00009.html That's why we didn't qualify less & co... In mainline (vs v7-branch), where we still don't have anything special for those function objects, maybe we should add the qualifications? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18604
