------- Additional Comments From lucier at math dot purdue dot edu 2005-06-15
22:31 -------
Subject: Re: Can't link 64-bit shared libraries with Xcode 2.1
On Jun 15, 2005, at 4:57 PM, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> That does not make sense as it should always include libgcc_s for
> dynamic libraries.
Here's a very short test file:
[descartes:gcc-4.0.0/objdir/4.0.0] lucier% cat conftest.c
int
main ()
{
return 0;
}
[descartes:gcc-4.0.0/objdir/4.0.0] lucier% /pkgs/gcc-4.0.0/bin/gcc
-dynamiclib -o conftest conftest.c
[descartes:gcc-4.0.0/objdir/4.0.0] lucier% otool -L conftest
conftest:
conftest (compatibility version 0.0.0, current version 0.0.0)
/pkgs/gcc-4.0.0/lib/libgcc_s.1.0.dylib (compatibility version
1.0.0, current version 1.0.0)
/usr/lib/libmx.A.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0, current
version 92.0.0)
/usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0,
current version 88.0.0)
[descartes:gcc-4.0.0/objdir/4.0.0] lucier% /pkgs/gcc-4.0.0/bin/gcc
-dynamiclib -m64 -o conftest conftest.c
[descartes:gcc-4.0.0/objdir/4.0.0] lucier% otool64 -L conftestconftest:
conftest (compatibility version 0.0.0, current version 0.0.0)
/usr/lib/libmx.A.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0, current
version 92.0.0)
/usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0,
current version 88.0.0)
Does your statement "That does not make sense" mean more than "that's
puzzling, and needs more investigation"?
Brad
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22082
