------- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2005-06-27 16:09 ------- Subject: Re: numeric_limits<signed>::is_modulo is inconsistend with gcc
"pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | I think we need to read: | "ISO/IEC 10967-1 Language Independent Arithmetic, part 1" since that | is what the standard references for is_modulo. yes, as pointed out in the message I sent. It was pointed out that the loop optimizers was making some assumtpions. If the only is only for the loop optimizers, then we can also consider the option of explicitly allowing specific behaviour for induction variables. At any rate, a proper resolution for this PR is hardly "the standard says it is undefined behaviour". -- Gaby -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22200
