------- Additional Comments From falk at debian dot org 2005-07-02 22:19 ------- (In reply to comment #8)
> I can't imagine a programmer casting into a pointer to volatile without really > meaning it, so if the behavior is not defined by the standard then both > compatibility and the principle of least astonishment seem to suggest > reverting > to the old behavior. I agree in principle. It might just turn out to be too hard to guarantee, in which case we might as well document that. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22278
