The example (attached below), when compiled by following gcc

-------------------
$ gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: i686-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../../../gcc-CVS-20051011/gcc-CVS-20051011/configure
--host=i686-pc-linux-gnu --prefix=/usr/local/opt/gcc-4.1
--exec-prefix=/usr/local/opt/gcc-4.1 --sysconfdir=/etc
--libdir=/usr/local/opt/gcc-4.1/lib --libexecdir=/usr/local/opt/gcc-4.1/libexec
--sharedstatedir=/var --localstatedir=/var --program-suffix=-4.1
--with-x-includes=/usr/X11R6/include --with-x-libraries=/usr/X11R6/lib
--enable-shared --enable-static --with-gnu-as --with-gnu-ld --with-stabs
--enable-threads=posix --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs
--disable-coverage --disable-libgcj --disable-checking --enable-multilib
--with-x --enable-cmath --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-fast-character
--enable-hash-synchronization --with-system-zlib --with-libbanshee
--with-demangler-in-ld --with-arch=athlon-xp --disable-libada
--enable-languages=c,c++,f95,objc
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.1.0 20051010 (experimental)
-------------------

with

-------------------
gcc -O3 -ftree-loop-linear -c quant_lsp.c -o quant_lsp.o
-------------------

results in this:

-------------------
quant_lsp.c: In function ‘lsp_quant_48k’:
quant_lsp.c:103: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
-------------------

This fails on both i686-pc-linux-gnu and x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. It seems that the
regression was introduced somewhere between CVS-20050723 (which works) and
CVS-20050812 (which doesn't).


-- 
           Summary: [4.1 Regression] ICE with -O3 -ftree-loop-linear
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.1.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: tree-optimization
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: drab at kepler dot fjfi dot cvut dot cz
GCC target triplet: i?86-*-*, x86_64-*-*


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24309

Reply via email to