------- Comment #7 from dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu 2005-11-01 15:15 ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Hmm, > I am still not sure if it matters too much, but since there are actually > dupes of this problem, I think we can simply add peep2 fixing this > particular common case. > > I am testing attached patch.
Could you please try to measure the code size impact of this patch? (like the examples in PR23153: xterm, PR8361 or kernel) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23303
