------- Comment #10 from law at redhat dot com 2005-11-01 18:50 -------
Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] Missing 'used
unintialized' warning
On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 18:29 +0000, dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org
wrote:
>
> ------- Comment #9 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-01 18:29
> -------
>
> Jeff has a much better approach to solving this.
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-11/msg00032.html
I'd rather you not assign it to me just yet -- while I think my approach
is better, I don't think we have a consensus that it's what we're going
to do yet :-)
jeff
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18501
