------- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-21 22:53 ------- (In reply to comment #2) > I'm ready to do that, but since complex numbers in C are always a pain, I > want to know: are we sure that conj/conjf/conjl are *always* available? I > mean, are they part of the things gcc provides even if there is no library > support for them in the runtime libm?
Hmm, I have to think about that but you can always use the GCC extension :) as mentioned before. I think the builtin version of conj/conjf/conjl (__builtin_conj/__builtin_conjf/__builtin_conjl) is always expanded to CONJ_EXPR but I could be wrong. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24903