------- Comment #4 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2005-11-30 14:28 ------- Subject: link failure for several acats tests
Here's the link failure: splitting /SCRATCH/gcc-build/IRIX64/mips-sgi-irix6.5/gcc-4.0.2/gcc-4.0.2/gcc/testsuite/ada/acats/tests/a/a83a02b.ada into: a83a02b.adb BUILD a83a02b.adb gnatmake --GCC="/SCRATCH/gcc-build/IRIX64/mips-sgi-irix6.5/gcc-4.0.2/gcc-4.0.2/gcc/xgcc -B/SCRATCH/gcc-build/IRIX64/mips-sgi-irix6.5/gcc-4.0.2/gcc-4.0.2/gcc/" -gnatws -O2 -I/SCRATCH/gcc-build/IRIX64/mips-sgi-irix6.5/gcc-4.0.2/gcc-4.0.2/gcc/testsuite/ada/acats/support a83a02b.adb -largs --GCC="/SCRATCH/gcc-build/IRIX64/mips-sgi-irix6.5/gcc-4.0.2/gcc-4.0.2/gcc/xgcc -B/SCRATCH/gcc-build/IRIX64/mips-sgi-irix6.5/gcc-4.0.2/gcc-4.0.2/gcc/" /SCRATCH/gcc-build/IRIX64/mips-sgi-irix6.5/gcc-4.0.2/gcc-4.0.2/gcc/xgcc -c -B/SCRATCH/gcc-build/IRIX64/mips-sgi-irix6.5/gcc-4.0.2/gcc-4.0.2/gcc/ -gnatws -O2 -I/SCRATCH/gcc-build/IRIX64/mips-sgi-irix6.5/gcc-4.0.2/gcc-4.0.2/gcc/testsuite/ada/acats/support a83a02b.adb gnatbind -aO./ -I/SCRATCH/gcc-build/IRIX64/mips-sgi-irix6.5/gcc-4.0.2/gcc-4.0.2/gcc/testsuite/ada/acats/support -I- -x a83a02b.ali gnatlink a83a02b.ali --GCC=/SCRATCH/gcc-build/IRIX64/mips-sgi-irix6.5/gcc-4.0.2/gcc-4.0.2/gcc/xgcc -B/SCRATCH/gcc-build/IRIX64/mips-sgi-irix6.5/gcc-4.0.2/gcc-4.0.2/gcc/ /SCRATCH/gcc-build/IRIX64/mips-sgi-irix6.5/install/bin/ld:GNAT-a0JcSb: file format not recognized; treating as linker script /SCRATCH/gcc-build/IRIX64/mips-sgi-irix6.5/install/bin/ld:GNAT-a0JcSb:2: parse error collect2: ld returned 1 exit status gnatlink: cannot call /SCRATCH/gcc-build/IRIX64/mips-sgi-irix6.5/gcc-4.0.2/gcc-4.0.2/gcc/xgcc gnatmake: *** link failed. FAIL: a83a02b Rainer laurent at guerby dot net schrieb: > ------- Comment #3 from laurent at guerby dot net 2005-11-30 11:56 ------- > Could you post the link failure for test in-build? > May be it's something like running ranlib on the libraries, a step that we > might be doing only at install, could you try that? > > Thanks, > > Laurent > > -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24468
