------- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-11-30 19:41 -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> Confirmed.  Reminds a bit of PR 15809.
> 
Oh woe is me! Unfortunately it is not the same.

OK, I am onto it.....

Paul T


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24789

Reply via email to