Last known to work with: "Fri Dec 30 21:24:33 UTC 2005 (revision 109181M)".
Known to fail with: "Wed Jan 11 14:14:27 UTC 2006 (revision 109585M)".
FAIL: ext/pb_assoc/example/erase_if.cc execution test
With the message in the .log being:
...
PASS: ext/pb_assoc/example/erase_if.cc (test for excess errors)
/home/hp/combined41/combined/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/ext/pb_assoc/example/erase_if.cc:89:
void some_op_sequence(Cntnr) [with Cntnr\
= pb_assoc::tree_assoc_cntnr<int, char, std::less<int>,
pb_assoc::rb_tree_ds_tag, pb_assoc::null_node_updator, std::allocator<ch\
ar> >]: Assertion `c.size() == 20' failed.^M
program stopped with signal 6.^M
FAIL: ext/pb_assoc/example/erase_if.cc execution test
There were changes to both the c++ and libstdc++ in this time-frame.
Let's start with blaming libstdc++ as "component".
--
Summary: [4.1 regression] libstdc++ testsuite:
ext/pb_assoc/example/erase_if.cc execution test
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: cris-axis-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25815
